Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
2.
BMJ Open ; 12(8): e056615, 2022 08 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2001832

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Several non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as physical distancing, handwashing, self-isolation, and school and business closures, were implemented in British Columbia (BC) following the first laboratory-confirmed case of COVID-19 on 26 January 2020, to minimise in-person contacts that could spread infections. The BC COVID-19 Population Mixing Patterns Survey (BC-Mix) was established as a surveillance system to measure behaviour and contact patterns in BC over time to inform the timing of the easing/re-imposition of control measures. In this paper, we describe the BC-Mix survey design and the demographic characteristics of respondents. PARTICIPANTS: The ongoing repeated online survey was launched in September 2020. Participants are mainly recruited through social media platforms (including Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, WhatsApp). A follow-up survey is sent to participants 2-4 weeks after completing the baseline survey. Survey responses are weighted to BC's population by age, sex, geography and ethnicity to obtain generalisable estimates. Additional indices such as the Material and Social Deprivation Index, residential instability, economic dependency, and others are generated using census and location data. FINDINGS TO DATE: As of 26 July 2021, over 61 000 baseline survey responses were received of which 41 375 were eligible for analysis. Of the eligible participants, about 60% consented to follow-up and about 27% provided their personal health numbers for linkage with healthcare databases. Approximately 83.5% of respondents were female, 58.7% were 55 years or older, 87.5% identified as white and 45.9% had at least a university degree. After weighting, approximately 50% were female, 39% were 55 years or older, 65% identified as white and 50% had at least a university degree. FUTURE PLANS: Multiple papers describing contact patterns, physical distancing measures, regular handwashing and facemask wearing, modelling looking at impact of physical distancing measures and vaccine acceptance, hesitancy and uptake are either in progress or have been published.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , British Columbia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Hand Disinfection , Humans , Male , Masks , Physical Distancing
4.
Microbiol Spectr ; 10(2): e0140521, 2022 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1736038

ABSTRACT

We investigate the diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of finger prick capillary dried blood spot (DBS) samples tested by a quantitative multiplex anti-immunoglobulin G (IgG) assay to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies after infection or vaccination. This cross-sectional study involved participants (n = 6,841) from several serological surveys conducted in nonhospitalized children and adults throughout 2020 and 2021 in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Analysis used paired DBS and serum samples from a subset of participants (n = 642) prior to vaccination to establish signal thresholds and calculate diagnostic accuracy by logistic regression. Discrimination of the logistic regression model was assessed by receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis in an n = 2,000 bootstrap of the paired sample (n = 642). The model was cross-validated in a subset of vaccinated persons (n = 90). Unpaired DBS samples (n = 6,723) were used to evaluate anti-IgG signal distributions. In comparison to paired serum, DBS samples from an unvaccinated population possessed a sensitivity of 79% (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 58 to 91%) and specificity of 97% (95% CI: 95 to 98%). ROC analysis found that DBS samples accurately classify SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion at an 88% percent rate (area under the curve [AUC] = 88% [95% CI: 80 to 95%]). In coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine dose one or two recipients, the sensitivity of DBS testing increased to 97% (95% CI: 83 to 99%) and 100% (95% CI: 88 to 100%). Modeling found that DBS testing possesses a high positive predictive value (98% [95% CI: 97 to 98%]) in a population with 75% seroprevalence. We demonstrate that DBS testing should be considered to reliably detect SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity from natural infection or vaccination. IMPORTANCE Dried blood spot samples have comparable diagnostic accuracy to serum collected by venipuncture when tested by an electrochemiluminescent assay for antibodies and should be considered to reliably detect seropositivity following SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Antibodies, Viral , Antibody Formation , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Vaccines , Child , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Seroepidemiologic Studies
5.
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs ; 82(1):158-160, 2021.
Article in English | APA PsycInfo | ID: covidwho-1726974

ABSTRACT

Reply by the current author to the comments made by Kathleen M. Carroll et al. (see record 2021-06968-004), Brandon del Pozo (see record 2021-06968-005) and Anna Lembke (see record 2021-06968-006) on the original article (see record 2021-06968-003). We appreciate the authors' commentaries engaging with our perspective article on the potential roles for drug decriminalization and safe supply in response to the syndemic of HIV, hepatitis C, overdose, and COVID-19 among people who use drugs (PWUD). They have each raised some commonly expressed concerns regarding the relative benefits and risks of safe supply;however, considering the life-or-death importance of this topic, we feel it is necessary to address these arguments head-on. Here, we discuss how the crisis has changed over the last 20 years and how the urgent responses we detailed are desperately needed. We push back on the idea that harm reduction implementation needs to be done in a piecemeal way and that only certain types of treatment should be used. Last, we discuss the importance of implementing a range of responses that address the needs of PWUD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

6.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0261003, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1556871

ABSTRACT

The true severity of infection due to COVID-19 is under-represented because it is based on only those who are tested. Although nucleic acid amplifications tests (NAAT) are the gold standard for COVID-19 diagnostic testing, serological assays provide better population-level SARS-CoV-2 prevalence estimates. Implementing large sero-surveys present several logistical challenges within Canada due its unique geography including rural and remote communities. Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling is a practical solution but comparative performance data on SARS-CoV-2 serological tests using DBS is currently lacking. Here we present test performance data from a well-characterized SARS-CoV-2 DBS panel sent to laboratories across Canada representing 10 commercial and 2 in-house developed tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Three commercial assays identified all positive and negative DBS correctly corresponding to a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI = 72.2, 100). Two in-house assays also performed equally well. In contrast, several commercial assays could not achieve a sensitivity greater than 40% or a negative predictive value greater than 60%. Our findings represent the foundation for future validation studies on DBS specimens that will play a central role in strengthening Canada's public health policy in response to COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Dried Blood Spot Testing , Area Under Curve , COVID-19/virology , Humans , ROC Curve , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
Liver Int ; 41(12): 2849-2856, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1443317

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Public health measures introduced to limit transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), also disrupted various healthcare services in many regions worldwide, including British Columbia (BC), Canada. We assessed the impact of these measures, first introduced in BC in March 2020, on hepatitis C (HCV) testing and first-time HCV-positive diagnoses within the province. METHODS: De-identified HCV testing data for BC residents were obtained from the provincial Public Health Laboratory. Weekly changes in anti-HCV, HCV RNA and genotype testing episodes and first-time HCV-positive (anti-HCV/RNA/genotype) diagnoses from January 2018 to December 2020 were assessed and associations were determined using segmented regression models examining rates before vs after calendar week 12 of 2020, when measures were introduced. RESULTS: Average weekly HCV testing and first-time HCV-positive diagnosis rates fell immediately following the imposition of public health measures by 62.3 per 100 000 population and 2.9 episodes per 1 000 000 population, respectively (P < .0001 for both), and recovered in subsequent weeks to near pre-March 2020 levels. Average weekly anti-HCV positivity rates decreased steadily pre-restrictions and this trend remained unchanged afterwards. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in HCV testing and first-time HCV-positive diagnosis rates, key drivers of progression along the HCV care cascade, occurred following the introduction of COVID-19-related public health measures. Further assessment will be required to better understand the full impact of these service disruptions on the HCV care cascade and to inform strategies for the re-engagement of people who may have been lost to care because of these measures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hepatitis C , British Columbia/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/diagnosis , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2
8.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs ; 81(5): 556-560, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-841750

ABSTRACT

People who use drugs (PWUD) face concurrent public health emergencies from overdoses, HIV, hepatitis C, and COVID-19, leading to an unprecedented syndemic. Responses to PWUD that go beyond treatment--such as decriminalization and providing a safe supply of pharmaceutical-grade drugs--could reduce impacts of this syndemic. Solutions already implemented for COVID-19, such as emergency safe-supply prescribing and providing housing to people experiencing homelessness, must be sustained once COVID-19 is contained. This pandemic is not only a public health crisis but also a chance to develop and maintain equitable and sustainable solutions to the harms associated with the criminalization of drug use.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , Hepatitis C/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Syndemic , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Criminals , Drug Overdose/complications , Drug Overdose/epidemiology , Drug Overdose/prevention & control , Emergency Medical Services , HIV Infections/complications , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Hepatitis C/complications , Hepatitis C/prevention & control , Housing , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Prescriptions , SARS-CoV-2 , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , United States/epidemiology , United States Public Health Service
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL